The Philosophy of the Taiwanese Government's
Measures Against COVID-19

1. Don’t Panic!

The Taiwanese Government has followed three basic principles for policy decisions to respond to the overall anxiety in society: being transparent, being responsive, and creating positive incentives.

More

2. Learn from Past Mistakes

Taiwan was badly hit by SARS in 2003. Public health information sharing by WHO was denied to Taiwan due to China. Since then, Taiwan has improved regulations and adopted a “distrust and verify” attitude toward China.

More

3. It's a National Movement

The Government has been working hard to reduce the burdens and create incentives so that society has been willing to conform with interventions such as social distancing and mandatory face covering.

More

4. Healthcare Capacity Matters

The sustainability of the healthcare system during the pandemic always remains the top priority of policy decisions; consequently, several strategies were decided to avoid the collapse of healthcare (as a result of community spread).

More

5. Creating a
Non-Judgmental Space

Taiwanese Government and civil society have been greatly aware of disease stigma and its harmful results: potential patients and their contacts would be less likely to comply with disease prevention measures.

More

6. Taiwan Can Help!

Taiwan is eager to contribute to global health by donating medical supplies, sharing experiences, and demonstrating that through creativeness and cooperation disease prevention can be both efficient and respect human rights.

GO!

Don’t Panic!

Taiwanese Government has followed three basic principles for policy decisions to respond to the overall anxiety in society, which is counterproductive to disease control: being transparent, being responsive, and creating positive incentives.



Learn from Past Mistakes

Taiwan was badly hit by SARS in 2003. Public health information sharing by WHO was denied to Taiwan due to China. Since then, Taiwan has improved relevant regulations and adopted a “distrust and verify” attitude toward China.



The newly implemented SOPs and regulations grants authority to the newly established CDC for instant and centralized policy response.

The “distrust and verify” attitude assumes that instant and transparent information exchange on public health affairs with China may not be feasible, and any information received from Chinese officials shall not be taken for granted but verified with cautions.

It's a National Movement

Good disease control requires cooperation between public and private sectors. The Government has been working hard to reduce the burdens and create incentives so that society has been willing to conform with interventions such as social distancing and mandatory face covering.



For example, the Government has developed a real-name system that utilizes the NHI cards (which are held by 99.5% of all citizens and residents) to make the distribution of masks both highly-accessible and fair.

Another illustrating example is that officials of the epidemic control center (CECC) wore pink masks at the press conference, in response to complaints of school bullying for wearing the “sissy” color, to deliver the message that colors of mask don’t matter and gender stereotypes shall not become obstacles for people to conform disease prevention measures.

Healthcare Capacity Matters

The sustainability of the healthcare system during the pandemic always remains the top priority of policy decisions; consequently, several strategies were decided to avoid the collapse of healthcare (as a result of community spread).



Creating a Non-Judgmental Space

Taiwanese Government and civil society have been greatly aware of disease stigma and its harmful results: potential patients and their contacts would be less likely to comply with disease prevention measures.



The CDC had consulted with HIV/AIDS advocacy groups and kept a non-judgmental attitude in policy making. The CECC, from the very beginnings, has repeatedly stated that being infected is not blameworthy; if patients were heavily disparaged and discredited, then they would conceal their own contact histories and make the disease prevention difficult.

For the same reason, information that could potentially be used to identify patients, such as precise location histories, would not be disclosed unless necessary. To strengthen support of the infected, the Government has set up a hotline for resource referrals and consulting. The desired outcome of these policies is to create an overall non-judgmental and supportive environment for the known patients and those potential ones.

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies. More info.

Got it!